USC HomepageUSC Homepage
USC Homepage

Moore School Web Site | Division of Research | Publications of the Institute of Applied Research | B&E Review | B&E Review, Volume 54 | B&E Review, Volume 54, Number 2




Environmental Update

Phillip E. Barnes

Consumers

: Are you an “eco-shopper,” but confused with all the labels and seals and certified logos? Consumers Union—publisher of Consumer Reports—has a Web site that can give you detailed information on various seals and labels you find on products. You can also learn the meanings of words like “biodegradable” and “cruelty-free.” When consumers see “green” labels on a product in stores today, they usually think it’s “another marketing term to appeal to a highly attractive and growing demographic of environmentally conscious—but consistently frustrated—shoppers.” Check out
http://www.eco-labels.org

: Biofuels are worse for the environment than fossil fuels. So says David Gutierrez, whose article on Oct. 11, 2007, in News Target, discusses a report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which says that “instead of a solution to the global ecological crisis induced by fossil fuels, biofuels offer a cure that is worse for the environment than fossil fuels.” The OECD urges a focus on continuing to reduce the use of fossil fuels through people walking, riding bicycles, carpooling, and keeping their vehicle’s engine tuned. Practices like these are much cheaper for the economy than subsidizing inefficient new energy sources. For more information, go to http://www.newstarget.
com/z022112.html and http://organicconsumers
.org/environment.cfm.

: In early 2007, Chinese environmental, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) joined together to launch a new “Green Choice Initiative.” The initiative targets China’s ever-growing consumer population and encourages “all individuals to consider a company’s environmental performance in guiding their daily purchasing decisions.” However, many of the brand-name companies pollute illegally. Therefore, by “scrutinizing the goods produced by these polluting companies, Chinese consumers can use their vast purchasing power to exert pressure on these companies, which will cause them to change their harmful environmental practices.” See “The Green Choice Initiative Has Been Launched,” Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, Beijing, June 2007, http://www.oecdobserver
.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/2238/China%92s_clean_choice__.html.
 

 

Business

: Occidental Petroleum operated in the Peruvian Amazon for more than 30 years. During this time, the company daily dumped approximately 850,000 barrels of toxic oil byproducts into the water systems that the Achuar Indians used for fishing, drinking, and bathing. According to Dashka Slater, a writer for the Sierra Club, Occidental, whose 2006 revenues topped $18 billion, claims that “it has no responsibility because it sold its Peruvian concession in 2000 to Pluspetrol, an Argentine company. Pluspetrol has taken responsibility for the damages it caused since 2000 and will clean up what its operations left behind. On the other hand, Occidental, who also violated Peruvian laws, international standards and the rights of the Achuar Indians, will claim no responsibility.” The investigating team report can be found at: http://www.earthrights.org/index2
.phpoption=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=435.

: Stronger, environmentally related requirements for export credits are a focus of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OCED). A new agreement of the OCED member countries requires governments to review export projects for their potential environmental impacts and to benchmark them against international standards. The agreement also calls for more public exposure of information that “will increase transparency for the most sensitive projects.” This new agreement will affect the number of export credits exporters receive. Governments provide export credits through their Export Credit Agency to support national exporters competing for overseas sales. For more information on export credits, go to www.oecd.org/ech/xcred.

: Recently, I was invited to participate in a discussion on the environment with a Sunday School class at the Episcopal Church of St. Jude and St. Simon in Lexington, South Carolina. I had never thought much about the church and ecology until the invitation from the Episcopalians. We had a lively discussion, and I was surprised at the knowledge of the attendees on the environment, and at the eagerness of the class participants to learn about environmental issues. One young boy in the class amazed me with his definition of “an environmentalist.” After conducting a search on the Episcopal Church, I found that the Church and its members focus on being Stewards of the Earth. One example is “The Episcopal Ecological Network” (EpEN), a nationwide network within the Episcopal Church USA. The EpEN includes all concerned Episcopalians who are helping the Church assume a leadership role in the worldwide environmental movement. Read more about the EpEN at http://eenonline.org/.

 

Government

: There are 21 members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) who met in Sydney, Australia, in September 2007 to discuss trade opportunities and also “determine whether the worst impacts of dangerous climate change will be avoided. Between 2001 and 2006, global coal use grew by almost 30 percent, and 90 percent of this increase came from developing Asia.” According to Wendy Frew, an environment reporter
for the Sydney Morning Herald, Asian Pacific economies account for “over half the damage being done to the planet by fossil fuels and are the primary culprits behind large-scale deforestation. APEC members are working on solutions to stop
ecological abuse through proposing annual environmental impact reduction goals for member countries.” (http://www.smh.com.au/
news/environment/region-is-harming-planet/2007/09/04/1188783238172.html).

: A lawsuit filed against the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) by the Humane Society of the United States and Ocean Conservancy charged the NMFS with failing to issue rules to protect three endangered whale species from entanglement in commercial fishing gear. “Since 2003, eight North Atlantic right whales, fourteen humpback whales, and four fin whales have been seriously injured or killed by commercial fishing gear.” The suit was finally settled by the NMFS through its agreement to issue “new protective measures for endangered whales in the Atlantic.” The agreement went into effect Oct. 1, 2007 (www.oceanconservancy.org).

: In May 2007, 85 percent of France’s population turned out to vote in the presidential election. There are many changes that the winning candidate, (now) President Nicolas Sarkozy, has promised. Many investors predict that France’s economic goals are back on track with major labor and tax reforms that will “finally unleash France’s potential.” Included in these new economic goals are plans to initiate “green tax credits and tax breaks to encourage more environmentally friendly products and services.” Also, a new Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development will be created to implement eco-friendly policies, which the government believes will give France an even greater environmental edge. Vive la France!! (http://www.forbes.com/opinions/
2007/07/09/favre-invest-france-oped_pf_0710favre.html)

Dr. Phillip E. Barnes is Research Professor in the School of the Environment at the University of South Carolina. You can reach him at (803) 777-1373, or via e-mail at pbarnes@environ.sc.edu.

 

AACSB Accredited • Columbia, SC 29208 • info@moore.sc.edu © 2008 University of South Carolina Board of Trustees