Moore School Web Site | Division of Research | Publications of the Institute of Applied Research | SC Economic Indicators | Economic Indicators 2008

Volume 43, No. 6, June 2008
| Post any comments on our blog at http://ResearchatMoore.blogspot.com
|
|
Highlights |
Summary |
Indicator Data |
Commentary |
|
Highlights return to top
-
The Palmetto
economy added 4,500 jobs.
-
Residential
construction rose 1.3 percent.
-
The
unemployment rate jumped from 5.7 to 5.9 percent.
|

The Index of Leading
Indicators for South Carolina is composed of the Average Manufacturing
Workweek (hours), Initial Claims for Unemployment Insurance, and Real
Weekly Earnings

The Index of
Coincident Indicators for South Carolina is composed of Total
Nonagricultural Employment, Real Retail Sales, and Total Unemployment
Rate |
|
Summary return to top
The national economy remains weak, with little hope for
improvement in the short term. Rising energy and food prices are affecting
household budgets and slowing consumer spending. Residential real estate
markets are generally weak across most of the nation, and last month the
national unemployment rate jumped from 5 to 5.5 percent, posting its
sharpest one-month increase since February 1986. In May, the U.S. economy
lost 49,000 jobs, the fifth consecutive month of decline in total nonfarm
employment. The continued deterioration of the labor markets and the
inflationary pressures in the economy are clearly adding to the risks of
recession.
Against this backdrop, the South Carolina economy seems
to be holding better than the rest of the economy. This month, the South
Carolina Leading Index, which had decreased
steadily between August 2007 and February 2008, posted its second
consecutive increase, suggesting that economic conditions have finally
stabilized. However, this month’s small increase of 0.1 in the index is
also an indication that we should expect paltry economic gains in the
months ahead. The individual components of the leading index show again a
mixed record. After dropping 5.7 percent last month, residential
construction (seasonally adjusted) increased 1.8 percent this month.
April’s numbers for single-family housing permits also showed considerable
improvement this month. It may be early to claim that housing has reached
bottom in South Carolina, but the recent numbers suggest that there is
some reason for optimism. Average weekly unemployment insurance claims
remained above the 7,000 mark, but dropped 7.1 compared to last month. In
the last five years, unemployment insurance claims have averaged around
6,000, so this month’s figure of 7,071 shows that there is still
substantial pressure on the labor market. The two state economic
indicators for the manufacturing sector, average real weekly earnings and
average manufacturing workweek, experienced a small but meaningless drop
this month. In fact, the manufacturing sector, which has been shedding
jobs since the last recession of 2001, experienced a small increase in
employment in the last two months. As discussed in this month’s
commentary, exports of goods from South Carolina have increased
substantially, and may be the reason manufacturing is holding so well.
Finally, the other component of the South Carolina
Leading Index, the U.S. Leading Index, increased again this month by 0.1
percentage points.
The South Carolina Coincident Index slipped 0.3
percentage points, indicating a decrease in economic activity this month.
This drop was driven by two of the components of the index, retail sales
and the unemployment rate. Real retail sales dropped 1.6 percent compared
with last month. However, retail sales should bounce back next month with
the arrival of the stimulus checks to households. The unemployment rate
increased from 5.7 to 5.9 percent, an increase of 0.2 percentage points,
much smaller than the increase of 0.5 percentage points observed for the U.S. economy. The total employment component
of the index increased 0.2 percent this month. Construction lost an
additional 2,800 jobs this month, but employment increases in the
financial, education, health, and leisure and hospitality sectors were
able to offset the loss in construction.
In sum, as was predicted several months ago, the
Palmetto economy is going through a period of anemic growth. Given the
national softening labor market and the inflationary pressures currently
observed, significant improvement is not expected in the months
ahead. |



|
|
Indicator data . . . return to
top |
| Indices, Leading, and Coincident
Indicators seasonally adjusted data for February 2008 through April
2008. |
Indices |
Feb-08 |
Mar-08 |
Apr-08 |
| Leading Index (1992=100) |
138.5 [R] |
140.1 [R] |
140.3 |
|
monthly percentage change |
-1.5 |
1.2 |
0.1 |
|
annual percentage change |
-4.4 |
-1.9 |
-2.2 |
| Coincident Index (1992=100) |
134.3 |
134.0 |
133.6 |
|
monthly percentage change |
0.5 |
-0.3 |
-0.3 |
|
annual percentage change |
2.6 |
2.1 |
1.1 |
Leading Indicators |
|
|
|
| Average Manufacturing Workweek (hours) [1] |
41.8 |
43.0 [R] |
42.8 |
|
monthly percentage change |
-1.9 |
2.7 |
-0.4 |
|
annual percentage change |
2.1 |
2.4 |
1.9 |
| Initial Claims for
Unemployment Ins. [1] |
7,199 [R] |
7,608 [R] |
7,071 |
|
monthly percentage change |
39.7 |
5.7 |
-7.1 |
|
annual percentage change |
25.4 |
37.6 |
4.7 |
| Real Weekly Earnings* [1] |
$308.10 [R] |
$318.90 |
$317.50 |
|
monthly percentage change |
-2.5 |
3.5 |
-0.5 |
|
annual percentage change |
-3.4 |
-0.2 |
-0.7 |
| Residential Construction Dwelling Units [2] |
2,299 [R] |
2,169 [R] |
2,208 |
|
monthly percentage change |
6.9 |
-5.7 |
1.8 |
|
annual percentage change |
-25.2 |
-29.1 |
-24.2 |
| U.S. Leading Index [3] |
135.0 |
135.1 |
135.2 |
|
monthly percentage change |
-0.3 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
annual percentage change |
-1.5 |
-2.0 |
-1.7 |
Coincident Indicators |
|
|
|
| Real Retail Sales (millions)* [4] |
$5,807 [R] |
$5,743 [R] |
$5,654 |
|
monthly percentage change |
1.6 |
-1.1 |
-1.6 |
|
annual percentage change |
5.9 |
0.0 |
-1.2 |
| Total Nonagricultural Employment (000s) [1] |
1,956 [R] |
1,952 [R] |
1,956 |
|
monthly percentage change |
-0.5 |
-0.2 |
0.2 |
|
annual percentage change |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
| Total
Unemployment Rate [1] |
5.5 |
5.7 |
5.9 |
|
monthly absolute change |
-0.6 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
annual absolute change |
-0.6 |
-0.3 |
0.1 |
Notes [1] Calculated from data provided by
the S.C. Employment Security Commission. [2] Calculated from data
provided by the F.W. Dodge Corporation. [3] Calculated from data
provided by The Conference Board. [4] Calculated from data provided by
the S.C. Department of Revenue. [R] Revised. [n.a.] Data not
available. Monthly percentage change based on seasonally adjusted
data. Annual percentage change based on unadjusted data. *1982-1984
dollars |
|
Commentary return to top
For the last several years, the U.S. dollar has been
steadily depreciating against other major currencies. A trade-weighted
exchange index against a basket of the United States’ trading partners’
currencies shows that, since 2002, the dollar has lost more than 30
percent of its value. The largest decline occurred against the euro. In
November 2002, a dollar exchanged at parity with the euro, but in April
2008, the exchange rate was 1.58 dollars per euro.
The dollar’s steep fall in recent years has been linked
to increases in the price of energy and commodities in the international
markets and increased prices of imported goods in general. However, the
lower dollar also had the effect of boosting U.S. exports, an important
shock absorber during the economy’s troubles. During the last four years,
U.S. exports of goods and services have increased around 8 percent a year
in real terms and are assuming increasing importance in the GDP. In 2006,
exports comprised 11.1 percent of U.S. GDP, the highest ever in dollar
terms.
Because of its strong manufacturing base and
export-oriented industry, South Carolina is one of the state economies
that most depends on world markets. The state has the highest overall
share of export-supported jobs (9 percent) among the 50 states, and more
than one-fourth of all manufacturing workers in South Carolina depend on
exports for their jobs. More than that, the export sector in South
Carolina seems to be taking advantage of this opportunity. The cumulative
data up to April 2008 shows that this year, the U.S. exports of
manufactured goods increased by 14.8 percent compared to the same period
last year. However, comparable figures for South Carolina show an increase
of 47.1 percent, one of the highest growth rates in the nation.
|
|